← Back to search

Band renormalization and Fermi surface reconstruction in iron-based superconductors

Shun-Li Yu, Jing Kang, Jian-Xin Li

arXiv:0901.0821 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.064517 · 2009-01-07 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical33 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Using the fluctuation exchange approximation and a three-orbital model, we study the band renormalization, Fermi surface reconstruction and the superconducting pairing symmetry in the newly-discovered iron-based superconductors. We find that the inter-orbital spin fluctuations lead to the strong anisotropic band renormalization and the renormalization is orbital dependent. As a result, the topology of Fermi surface displays distinct variation with doping from the electron type to the hole type, which is consistent with the recent experiments. This shows that the Coulomb interactions will have a strong effect on the band renormalization and the topology of the electron Fermi pocket. In addition, the pairing state mediated by the inter-orbital spin fluctuation is of an extended s-wave symmetry.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LaOFeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26Pressure not reportedunknown
LaOFeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

41Pressure not reportedunknown
LaOFeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

56Pressure not reportedunknown
BaFe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers