AFe2As2 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu) and SrFe_(2-x)TM_(x)As2 (TM = Mn, Co, Ni): crystal structure, charge doping, magnetism and superconductivity
Deepa Kasinathan, Alim Ormeci, Katrin Koch, Ulrich Burkhardt, Walter Schnelle, Andreas Leithe-Jasper, Helge Rosner
arXiv:0901.1282 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/025023 · 2009-01-09 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The electronic structure and physical properties of the pnictide compound families $RE$OFeAs ($RE$ = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm), $A$Fe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ ($A$ = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu), LiFeAs and FeSe are quite similar. Here, we focus on the members of the $A$Fe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ family whose sample composition, quality and single crystal growth are better controllable compared to the other systems. Using first principles band structure calculations we focus on understanding the relationship between the crystal structure, charge doping and magnetism in $A$Fe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ systems. We will elaborate on the tetragonal to orthorhombic structural distortion along with the associated magnetic order and anisotropy, influence of doping on the $A$ site as well as on the Fe site, and the changes in the electronic structure as a function of pressure. Experimentally, we investigate the substitution of Fe in SrFe$_{2-x}TM_{x}$As$_{2}$ by other 3$d$ transition metals, $TM$ = Mn, Co, Ni. In contrast to a partial substitution of Fe by Co or Ni (electron doping) a corresponding Mn partial substitution does not lead to the supression of the antiferromagnetic order or the appearance of superconductivity. Most calculated properties agree well with the measured properties, but several of them are sensitive to the As $z$ position. For a microscopic understanding of the electronic structure of this new family of superconductors this structural feature related to the Fe-As interplay is crucial, but its correct ab initio treatment still remains an open question.
Similar papers
Presure-Induced Superconducting State of Antiferromagnetic CaFeAs
similarity 0.93Hanoh Lee et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0809.3550
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible high temperature superconductivity in Ti-doped A-Sc-Fe-As-O (A= Ca, Sr) system
similarity 0.93G. F. Chen et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0903.5273
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
(Sr_3Sc_2O_5)Fe_2As_2 as a possible parent compound for FeAs-based superconductors
similarity 0.92Xiyu Zhu et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0811.2205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High resolution x-ray scattering studies of structural phase transitions in Cr-doped BaFe2As2
similarity 0.91J. P. Clancy et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1106.6339
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of Co substitution on thermodynamic and transport properties and anisotropic in Ba(FeCo)As single crystals
similarity 0.91N. Ni et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0811.1767
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the Iron-Pnictide Parent Compound SrFe2As2
similarity 0.91K. C. Kirshenbaum et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.4141
Source status unknown — claims are unverified