← Back to search

Probing the Yb$^{3+}$ spin relaxation in Y$_{0.98}$Yb$_{0.02}$Ba$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{x}$ by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

A. Maisuradze, A. Shengelaya, B. I. Kochelaev, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, H. Keller, K. A. Müller

arXiv:0901.3525 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.054519 · 2009-01-22

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The relaxation of Yb$^{3+}$ in YBa$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{x}$ ($6<x<7$) was studied using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR). It was found that both electronic and phononic processes contribute to the Yb$^{3+}$ relaxation. The phononic part of the relaxation has an exponential temperature dependence, which can be explained by a Raman process via the coupling to high-energy ($\sim$500 K) optical phonons or an Orbach-like process via the excited vibronic levels of the Cu$^{2+}$ ions (localized Slonczewski-modes). In a sample with a maximum oxygen doping $x$=6.98, the electronic part of the relaxation follows a Korringa law in the normal state and strongly decreases below $T_{c}$. Comparison of the samples with and without Zn doping proved that the superconducting gap opening is responsible for the sharp decrease of Yb$^{3+}$ relaxation in YBa$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{6.98}$. It was shown that the electronic part of the Yb$^{3+}$ relaxation in the superconducting state follows the same temperature dependence as $^{63}$Cu and $^{17}$O nuclear relaxations despite the huge difference between the corresponding electronic and nuclear relaxation rates.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Y0.98Yb0.02Ba2Cu3O6.1

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0Pressure not reportedunknown
Y0.98Yb0.02Ba2Cu3O6.4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

12Pressure not reportedunknown
Y0.98Yb0.02Ba2Cu3O6.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

51Pressure not reportedunknown
Y0.98Yb0.02Ba2Cu3O6.6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

60Pressure not reportedunknown
Y0.98Yb0.02Ba2Cu3O6.98

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

93Pressure not reportedunknown
Y0.98Yb0.02Ba2(Cu0.97Zn0.03)3O6.95

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

57Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers