← Back to search

Terahertz magneto-transport measurements in underdoped PCCO and comparison with ARPES

G. S. Jenkins, D. C. Schmadel, P. L. Bach, R. L. Greene, X. Bechamp-Laganiere, G. Roberge, P. Fournier, H. D. Drew

arXiv:0902.1455 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.224525 · 2009-02-09

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present magneto-transport measurements performed on underdoped PCCO at THz frequencies as a function of temperature and doping. A rapidly decreasing Hall mass is observed as the doping is reduced consistent with the formation of small electron Fermi pockets. However, both dc and infrared (IR) magneto-transport data strongly deviate from the predictions of transport theory in the relaxation time approximation (RTA) based on angular resolved photoemission data. The Hall mass is observed to increase continuously with increasing temperature with no signature at the Neel temperature. In the paramagnetic state, the temperature dependence of the Hall mass is consistent with current vertex corrections to the Hall conductivity due to magnetic fluctuations as observed in overdoped PCCO. Possible causal mechanisms for the discrepancy between transport theory within the RTA and the magneto-transport data are discussed.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Pr1.88Ce0.12CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr1.865Ce0.135CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

12.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

19.6Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers