Is the nature of magnetic order in copper-oxides and in iron-pnictides different?

E. Manousakis; J. Ren; S. Meng; E. Kaxiras

doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2009.10.005

← Back to search

Is the nature of magnetic order in copper-oxides and in iron-pnictides different?

E. Manousakis, J. Ren, S. Meng, E. Kaxiras

arXiv:0902.3450 · DOI 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.10.005 · 2009-02-19 · Solid State Communications

T39 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We use the results of first-principles electronic structure calculations and a strong coupling perturbation approach, together with general theoretical arguments, to illustrate the differences in super-exchange interactions between the copper-oxides and iron-pnictides. We show that the two magnetic ground states can be understood in a simple manner within the same theoretical foundation. Contrary to the emerging view that magnetic order in the iron-pnictides is of itinerant nature, we argue that the observed magnetic moment is small because of frustration introduced by the electrons of the Fe orbitals as they compete to impose their preferred magnetic ordering.