Comment on "Probing Noise in Flux Qubits via Macroscopic Resonant Tunneling" (arXiv:0712.0838)
A. V. Nikulov
arXiv:0903.3575 · 2009-03-20 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Expert attention is attracted to the obvious contradiction of the assumption on macroscopic quantum tunnelling and on superposition of two macroscopically distinct quantum states of superconducting loop, considered as flux qubit, with the law of angular momentum conservation and the universally recognized quantum formalism.
Similar papers
Superposition of flux-qubit states and the law of angular momentum conservation
similarity 0.89A. V. Nikulov · 2009 · arXiv:0907.1873
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-qubit and the law of angular momentum conservation
similarity 0.88A. V. Nikulov · 2010 · arXiv:1005.3776
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise correlations in a flux qubit with tunable tunnel coupling
similarity 0.87Simon Gustavsson et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1104.5212
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conservation of Angular Momentum in a Flux Qubit
similarity 0.87E. M. Chudnovsky et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.6144
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure of superposition states in flux qubits
similarity 0.85J. I. Korsbakken et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.3622
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Differences between application of some basic principles of quantum mechanics on atomic and mesoscopic levels
similarity 0.84Alexey Nikulov · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506653
Source status unknown — claims are unverified