← Back to search

Anomalous Temperature Dependence of Lower Critical Field in Ultraclean URu$_2$Si$_2$

R. Okazaki, M. Shimozawa, H. Shishido, M. Konczykowski, Y. Haga, T. D. Matsuda, Y. Onuki, Y. Yanase, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda

arXiv:0909.1075 · DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.79.084705 · 2009-09-06 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

T1experimental11 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

To investigate a mysterious superconducting state of URu_2Si_2 embedded in the so-called hidden order state, the lower critical field H_{c1} is precisely determined down to 55 mK for H || a and H || c. For this purpose, the positional dependence of the local magnetic induction is measured on ultraclean single crystals (T_c = 1.4 K) with residual resistivity ratio exceeding 700. We find that the temperature dependence of H_{c1} significantly differs from that of any other superconductors. The whole H_{c1}(T) for H || a are well explained by the two superconducting gap structures with line and point nodes, which have been suggested by the recent thermal conductivity and specific heat measurements. On the other hand, for H || c, a change of slope with a distinct kink in H_{c1}(T), which cannot be accounted for by two gaps, is observed. This behavior for H || c sharply contrasts with the cusp behavior of H_{c1}(T) associated with a transition into another superconducting phase found in UPt_3 and U_{1-x}Th_xBe_{13}. The observed anomalous low-field diamagnetic response is possibly related to a peculiar vortex dynamics associated with chiral domains due to the multicomponent superconducting order parameter with broken time reversal symmetry.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
URu2Si2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.4Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers