← Back to search

Supression of electron correlations in the superconducting alloys of Rh$_{17-x}$Ir$_x$S$_{15}$

H R Naren, A Thamizhavel, A. K. Nigam, S Ramakrishnan

arXiv:0910.4478 · DOI 10.1016/j.physc.2010.06.011 · 2009-10-23 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications

T1theoretical4 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have studied the effect of Iridium doping (Rh$_{17-x}$Ir$_{x}$S$_{15}$) in the Rhodium sites of the strongly correlated superconductor Rh$_{17}$S$_{15}$. Even at low levels of doping (x = 1 and 2) we see a drastic change in the superconducting properties as compared to those of the undoped system. We deduce that there is a reduction in the density of states at the Fermi level from reduced Pauli susceptibility and Sommerfeld coefficient in the doped samples. Moreover, the second magnetization peak in the isothermal magnetization scan (`fishtail') which was very prominent in the magnetization data of the undoped crystal is suppressed in the doped samples. The temperature dependence of resistivity of the doped crystals show a remarkably different behavior from that of the undoped crystal with the appearance of a minima at lower temperatures, the position of which is fairly constant at different fields. Our data supports the notion that Iridium, which is a bigger atom than Rhodium expands the lattice thereby, reduces the electron correlations that existed due to the interaction between closer lying Rhodium atoms in the undoped system.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Rh17S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.4Pressure not reportedunknown
Rh17S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Rh17S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Rh17S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Rh16Ir1S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Rh16Ir1S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Rh16Ir1S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Rh15Ir2S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Rh15Ir2S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Rh15Ir2S15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers