Doping dependence of the $(π,π)$ shadow band in La-based cuprates studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
Rui-Hua He, X. J. Zhou, M. Hashimoto, T. Yoshida, K. Tanaka, S. -K. Mo, T. Sasagawa, N. Mannella, W. Meevasana, Hong Yao, M. Fujita, T. Adachi, S. Komiya, S. Uchida, Y. Ando, F. Zhou, Z. X. Zhao, A. Fujimori, Y. Koike, K. Yamada, Z. Hussain, Z. -X. Shen
arXiv:0911.2245 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/13/1/013031 · 2009-11-11 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The $(π,π)$ shadow band (SB) in La-based cuprate family (La214) was studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) over a wide doping range from $x=0.01$ to $x=0.25$. Unlike the well-studied case of the Bi-based cuprate family, an overall strong, monotonic doping dependence of the SB intensity at the Fermi level ($E_F$) was observed. In contrast to a previous report for the presence of the SB only close to $x=1/8$, we found it exists in a wide doping range, associated with a doping-independent $(π,π)$ wave vector but strongly doping-dependent intensity: It is the strongest at $x\sim 0.03$ and systematically diminishes as the doping increases until it becomes negligible in the overdoped regime. This SB with the observed doping dependence of intensity can in principle be caused by the antiferromagnetic fluctuations or a particular form of low-temperature orthorhombic lattice distortion known to persist up to $x\sim 0.21$ in the system, with both being weakened with increasing doping. However, a detailed binding energy dependent analysis of the SB at $x=0.07$ does not appear to support the former interpretation, leaving the latter as a more plausible candidate, despite a challenge in quantitatively linking the doping dependences of the SB intensity and the magnitude of the lattice distortion. Our finding highlights the necessity of a careful and global consideration of the inherent structural complications for correctly understanding the cuprate Fermiology and its microscopic implication.
Similar papers
Multiple Bosonic Mode Coupling in Electron Self-Energy of (La_2-xSr_x)CuO_4
similarity 0.89X. J. Zhou et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0405130
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi Surface and Band Dispersion in La2-xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.89A. Ino et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9809311
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-wave superconducting gap observed in protect-annealed electron-doped cuprate superconductors PrLaCeCuO
similarity 0.88M. Horio et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.06024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extracting the spectral function of the cuprates by a full two-dimensional analysis: Angle-resolved photoemission spectra of Bi2Sr2CuO6
similarity 0.88W. Meevasana et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.0580
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Three-Dimensional Fermi Surface of Overdoped La-Based Cuprates
similarity 0.87M. Horio et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.08019
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Progress in Neutron Scattering Studies of Spin Excitations in High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.87Masaki Fujita et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.4431
Source status unknown — claims are unverified