Theoretical aspects of Andreev spectroscopy and tunneling spectroscopy in non-centrosymmetric superconductors: a topical review
Matthias Eschrig, Christian Iniotakis, Yukio Tanaka
arXiv:1001.2486 · 2010-01-14
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Tunneling spectroscopy at surfaces of unconventional superconductors has proven an invaluable tool for obtaining information about the pairing symmetry. It is known that mid gap Andreev bound states manifest itself as a zero bias conductance peak in tunneling spectroscopy. The zero bias conductance peak is a signature for a non-trivial pair potential that exhibits different signs on different regions of the Fermi surface. Here, we review recent theoretical results on the spectrum of Andreev bound states near interfaces and surfaces in non-centrosymmetric superconductors. We introduce a theoretical scheme to calculate the energy spectrum of a non-centrosymmetric superconductor. Then, we discuss the interplay between the spin orbit vector field on the Fermi surface and the order parameter symmetry. The Andreev states carry a spin supercurrent and represent a helical edge mode along the interface. We study the topological nature of the resulting edge currents. If the triplet component of the order parameter dominates, then the helical edge mode exists. If, on the other hand, the singlet component dominates, the helical edge mode is absent. A quantum phase transition occurs for equal spin singlet and triplet order parameter components. We discuss the tunneling conductance and the Andreev point contact conductance between a normal metal and a non-centrosymmetric superconductor.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UBe13 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrOs4Sb12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Andreev spectroscopy of Majorana states in topological superconductors with multipocket Fermi surfaces
similarity 0.91Ana C. Silva et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.00895
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fractional ac Josephson effect in p- and d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90Hyok-Jon Kwon et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0210148
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bound states at the interface between antiferromagnets and superconductors
similarity 0.90B. M. Andersen et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508214
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Andreev bound state in non-centrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.89Yukio Tanaka et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.3544
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-dependent Andreev bound states of a quantum dot coupled to two superconducting leads
similarity 0.89R. Taranko et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.02153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Model for Vortex-core tunneling spectroscopy of chiral p-wave superconductors via odd-frequency pairing states
similarity 0.89Y. Tanuma et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.0680
Source status unknown — claims are unverified