Strong energy-momentum dispersion of phonon-dressed carriers in the lightly doped band insulator SrTiO$_3$
W. Meevasana, X. J. Zhou, B. Moritz, C-C. Chen, R. H. He, S. -I. Fujimori, D. H. Lu, S. -K. Mo, R. G. Moore, F. Baumberger, T. P. Devereaux, D. van der Marel, N. Nagaosa, J. Zaanen, Z. -X. Shen
arXiv:1002.1466 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/023004 · 2010-02-07 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Much progress has been made recently in the study of the effects of electron-phonon (el-ph) coupling in doped insulators using angle resolved photoemission (ARPES), yielding evidence for the dominant role of el-ph interactions in underdoped cuprates. As these studies have been limited to doped Mott insulators, the important question arises how this compares with doped band insulators where similar el-ph couplings should be at work. The archetypical case is the perovskite SrTiO$_3$ (STO), well known for its giant dielectric constant of 10000 at low temperature, exceeding that of La$_2$CuO$_4$ by a factor of 500. Based on this fact, it has been suggested that doped STO should be the archetypical bipolaron superconductor. Here we report an ARPES study from high-quality surfaces of lightly doped SrTiO$_3$. Comparing to lightly doped Mott insulators, we find the signatures of only moderate electron-phonon coupling: a dispersion anomaly associated with the low frequency optical phonon with a $λ'\sim0.3$ and an overall bandwidth renormalization suggesting an overall $λ'\sim0.7$ coming from the higher frequency phonons. Further, we find no clear signatures of the large pseudogap or small polaron phenomena. These findings demonstrate that a large dielectric constant itself is not a good indicator of el-ph coupling and highlight the unusually strong effects of the el-ph coupling in doped Mott insulators.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electronic spin susceptibility in metallic strontium titanate
similarity 0.90A. Najev et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.17558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Isotope effect in superconducting n-doped SrTiO
similarity 0.88A. Stucky et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1610.10045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of spin-orbit interaction and electron correlations in strontium titanate
similarity 0.88Sergei Urazhdin et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.04184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity induced by fluctuations of momentum-based multipoles
similarity 0.88Shuntaro Sumita & Youichi Yanase · 2020 · arXiv:2004.08086
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phonon mechanism in the most dilute superconductor: n-type SrTiO3
similarity 0.88Lev P. Gor'kov · 2015 · arXiv:1508.00529
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of doping on polar order in SrTiO from first-principles modeling
similarity 0.88Alex Hallett & John W. Harter · 2024 · arXiv:2411.05112
Source status unknown — claims are unverified