← Back to search

Temperature dependence of the superheating field in niobium

Valles, N. R. A., Liepe, M. U.

arXiv:1002.3182 · 2010-02-18

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the temperature dependence of superheating field, Hsh, of niobium. Accurately determining this field is important both to test theory and to understand gradient limits in superconducting cavities for particle accelerators. This paper discusses theories that have been proposed in modeling the field and discriminates between them. The experimental procedure for measuring the temperature dependence of Hsh utilizes high power pulses to drive a niobium cavity resonator, ramping up surface magnetic fields extremely quickly. The moment any part of the cavity transitions between the superconducting and normal conducting state can be determined by measuring the quality factor of the cavity as a function of time. Oscillating superleak transducers are used to demonstrate that the transition to the normal conducting state is global in nature, showing that a fundamental limit is encountered. Finally, we see that 110-120 C heat treatment of the cavity--a method commonly used to increase the quality factor at high accelerating gradients--may have the deleterious effect of reducing the superheating field of the material, which is the fundamental limiting factor in pursuing the maximal achievable accelerating gradient in superconducting niobium cavities.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9.2Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reported—

Similar papers