Why some Iron-based superconductors are nodal while others are nodeless
Ronny Thomale, Christian Platt, Werner Hanke, B. Andrei Bernevig
arXiv:1002.3599 · 2010-02-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The symmetry of the order parameter in iron-based superconductors, especially the presence or absence of nodes, is still a question of debate. While contradictory experiments can be explained by appropriately tuned theories of nodeless superconductivity in the iron-arsenide compounds, for LaOFeP all experiments clearly point to a nodal order parameter. We put forward a scenario that naturally explains the difference between the order-parameter character in these two sets of compounds, and use functional renormalization group (fRG) techniques to analyze it in detail. Our results show that, due to the orbital content of the electron and hole bands, nodal superconductivity on the electron pockets (hole pocket gaps are always nodeless) can naturally appear when the third hole pocket which lies at wavevector (pi,pi) in the unfolded Brillouin zone is absent, as is the case in LaOFeP. When present, the third hole pocket has overwhelming d_{xy} orbital character, and the intra-orbital interaction with the d_{xy} dominated part of the electron Fermi surface is enough to drive the superconductivity nodeless (of s^+- form). However, in its absence, pair hopping, inter-orbital, and electron-electron intra-orbital interactions render the gap on the electron pockets softly nodal.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaOFeP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaOFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nodeless vs nodal order parameters in LiFeAs and LiFeP superconductors
similarity 0.90K. Hashimoto et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.4505
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Functional Renormalization Group for multi-orbital Fermi Surface Instabilities
similarity 0.90Christian Platt et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.6191
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Accessing topological superconductivity via a combined STM and renormalization group analysis
similarity 0.90Lars Elster et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1408.3551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Puzzle of High Temperature Superconductivity in Layered Iron Pnictides and Chalcogenides
similarity 0.89David C. Johnston · 2010 · arXiv:1005.4392
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mechanism for Explaining Differences in the Order Parameters of FeAs-Based and FeP-Based Pnictide Superconductors
similarity 0.89Ronny Thomale et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin fluctuations in iron pnictides and chalcogenides: From antiferromagnetism to superconductivity
similarity 0.89Inosov, Dmytro S. · 2016 · arXiv:1502.06570
Source status unknown — claims are unverified