Thermal Phase Transition in Two-Dimensional Disordered Superconductors: Kosterlitz-Thouless vs Percolation
Amir Erez, Yigal Meir
arXiv:1002.3645 · 2010-02-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Weakly disordered two-dimensional superconductors undergo a Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT) transition, where at a critical temperature vortices proliferate through the system and destroy the superconducting (SC) order. On the other hand, it was suggested that for large disorder the systems separates into regions of high SC order, and it is the percolation of coherence between these regions that is lost at the critical temperature. Here we demonstrate that these two descriptions are just the dual of each other. A vortex causes loss of local correlations, and thus the loss of percolation of correlations is concomitant with percolation of vortices on the dual lattice, in the perpendicular direction, i.e. the KT transition.
Similar papers
Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in the smectic vortex state of a layered superconductor
similarity 0.91Gianni Blatter et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transitions driven by vortices in two-dimensional superfluids and superconductors: From Kosterlitz-Thouless to first order
similarity 0.91G. Alvarez & H. Fort
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nature of phase transitions in two-dimensional type-II superconductors
similarity 0.91Niels R. Walet & M. A. Moore
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Monte Carlo studies of percolation in a superconducting array
similarity 0.90X. C. Zeng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Dynamics and Phase Transitions in a Two-Dimensional Array of Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.90Ch. Leemann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a planar field theory through the Kosterlitz-Thouless mechanism
similarity 0.89R. MacKenzie et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified