Where Are the Extra d Electrons in Transition-Metal Substituted Fe Pnictides?
H. Wadati, I. Elfimov, G. A. Sawatzky
arXiv:1003.2663 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.157004 · 2010-03-13 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Transition-metal substitution in Fe pnictides leading to superconductivity is usually interpreted in terms of carrier doping to the system. We report on a density functional calculation of the local substitute electron density and demonstrate that substitutions like Co and Ni for Fe do not carrier dope but rather are isovalent to Fe. We find that the extra d electrons for Co and Ni are almost totally located within the muffin-tin sphere of the substituted site. We suggest that Co and Ni act more like random scatterers scrambling momentum space and washing out parts of the Fermi surface.
Similar papers
Charge doping versus impurity scattering in chemically substituted iron-pnictides
similarity 0.89Alexander Herbig et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.06941
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin excitations in the excitonic spin-density-wave state of the iron pnictides
similarity 0.87P. M. R. Brydon & C. Timm · 2009 · arXiv:0909.1222
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible superconductivity in platforms ?
similarity 0.87Zi-Jian Lang · 2023 · arXiv:2304.01127
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron irradiation of Co, Ni, and P-doped BaFe2As2 - type iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.86Cornelis Jacominus Van Der Beek et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1209.3586
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping effect of Cu and Ni impurities on the Fe-based superconductor Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2
similarity 0.86Peng Cheng et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.4568
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in SrFe_(2-x)Co_xAs_2: Internal Doping of the Iron Arsenide Layers
similarity 0.86A. Leithe-Jasper et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.2223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified