Flux pinning in (1111) iron-pnictide superconducting crystals
C. J. van der Beek, G. Rizza, M. Konczykowski, P. Fertey, I. Monnet, Thierry Klein, R. Okazaki, M. Ishikado, H. Kito, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, S. Shamoto, M. E. Tillman, S. L. Bud'ko, P. C. Canfield, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda
arXiv:1003.3936 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174517 · 2010-03-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Local magnetic measurements are used to quantitatively characterize heterogeneity and flux line pinning in PrFeAsO_1-y and NdFeAs(O,F) superconducting single crystals. In spite of spatial fluctuations of the critical current density on the macroscopic scale, it is shown that the major contribution comes from collective pinning of vortex lines by microscopic defects by the mean-free path fluctuation mechanism. The defect density extracted from experiment corresponds to the dopant atom density, which means that dopant atoms play an important role both in vortex pinning and in quasiparticle scattering. In the studied underdoped PrFeAsO_1-y and NdFeAs(O,F) crystals, there is a background of strong pinning, which we attribute to spatial variations of the dopant atom density on the scale of a few dozen to one hundred nm. These variations do not go beyond 5% - we therefore do not find any evidence for coexistence of the superconducting and the antiferromagnetic phase. The critical current density in sub-T fields is characterized by the presence of a peak effect, the location of which in the (B,T)-plane is consistent with an order-disorder transition of the vortex lattice.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| PrFeAsO1-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdFeAsO0.9F0.1 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdFeAsO0.9F0.1 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Flux dynamics associated with the second magnetization peak in the iron pnictide Ba1−xKxFe2As2
similarity 0.90S. Salem-Sugui, Jr. et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex creep and critical current densities in superconducting (Ba,K)FeAs single crystals
similarity 0.90Marcin Konczykowski et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1207.1796
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature and time scaling of the peak-effect vortex configuration in FeTeSe
similarity 0.89Marco Bonura et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.5934
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge doping-induced quasiparticle scattering in iron-pnictide superconductors as probed by vortex pinning
similarity 0.89Cornelis Jacominus van der Beek et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.2129
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fishtail effect and the vortex phase diagram of single crystal Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2
similarity 0.89Huan Yang et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.3786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux jumps and vortex pinning in BaNaFeAs single crystals
similarity 0.89A. K. Pramanik et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.2210
Source status unknown — claims are unverified