Strength of the phonon-coupling mode in $La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4}$, $Bi_{2}Sr_{2}CaCu_{2}O_{8+x}$ and $YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{6+x}$: An estimation from the ARPES-nodal measurements
H. S. Ruiz, A. Badía-Majós
arXiv:1005.4770 · 2010-05-26 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Despite the intensive efforts for determining the mechanism that causes high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxide materials, no consensus on the pairing mechanism has been reached. Recent advances in high resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopies have suggested that a sizeable electron-phonon coupling exists as the principal cause for kinks in the dispersion relations (energy versus wave vector) of the electronic states. Here, we report on a systematic study about the influence of the electron-phonon coupling parameter "$λ$" in the electronic quasiparticle dispersions along the nodal direction for $La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4}$, $Bi_{2}Sr_{2}CaCu_{2}O_{8+x}$ and $YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{6+x}$. Information about the dressing of the charge carriers, i.e., on the enhancement of the effective mass and the strength of the coupling mode, is obtained as a function of the doping concentration, temperature, momentum and energy from the kink dispersion in the (0-0)-$(π,π)$ direction of momentum-space avoiding the complications of the \textit{d-}wave superconducting gap. Our analysis shows a remarkable agreement between theory and experiment for different samples and at different doping levels. This includes our recently introduced theoretical model to adjust the experimental data of the fermionic band dispersion, emphasising the necessary distinction between the general electron mass-enhancement parameter $λ^{*}$ and the conventional electron-phonon coupling parameter $λ$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 68 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 41 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 58 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 58 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 58 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37.69 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40.04 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 33.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36.86 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35.01 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28.71 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 61 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 61 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 61 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quantitative Determination of Eliashberg Function and Evidence of Strong Electron Coupling with Multiple Phonon Modes in Heavily Over doped (Bi,Pb)2Sr2CuO6
similarity 0.91Lin Zhao et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.0120
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Catalogue of phonon modes in several cuprate high-temperature superconductors from density functional theory
similarity 0.90N. J. Jabusch et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.10553
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vibronic mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity
similarity 0.90Masashi Tachiki et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0212083
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties and challenges of hot-phonon physics in metals: MgB and other compounds
similarity 0.90Emmanuele Cappelluti et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.08597
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two energy scales in the spin excitations of the high-T_c superconductor LaSrCuO
similarity 0.89B. Vignolle et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0701151
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of electron-doped cuprate superconductors: Isotropic electron-phonon coupling
similarity 0.89Seung Ryong Park et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.0559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified