Reentrant behavior of superconducting alloys
Dawid Borycki, Jan Maćkowiak
arXiv:1007.0476 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/24/3/035007 · 2010-07-03 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A dirty BCS superconductor with magnetic impurities is studied. Asymptotic solution of the thermodynamics of such superconductor with spin $1/2$ and $7/2$ magnetic impurities, is found. To this end, the system's free energy $f(H, β)$ is bounded from above and below by mean-field type bounds, which are shown to coalesce almost exactly in the thermodynamic limit, provided the impurity concentration is sufficiently small. The resulting mean-field equations for the gap $Δ$ and a parameter $ν$, characterizing the impurity subsystem, are solved and the solution minimizing $f$ is found for various values of magnetic coupling constant $g$ and impurity concentration $x$. The phase diagrams of the system are depicted with five distinct phases: the normal phase, unperturbed superconducting phase, perturbed superconducting phase with nonzero gap in the excitation spectrum, perturbed gapless superconducting phase and impurity phase with completely suppressed superconductivity. Furthermore, evidence of reentrant superconductivity and Jaccarino-Peter compensation is found. The credibility of the theory is verified by testing the dependence of the superconducting transition temperature $T_{\text{c}}$ on $x$. Very good quantitative agreement with experimental data is obtained for several alloys: (La$_{1-x}$Ce$_{x}$)Al$_{2}$, (La$_{1-x}$Gd$_{x}$)Al$_{2}$ and (La$_{0.8-x}$Y$_{0.20}$)Ce$_{x}$. The theory presented improves earlier developments in this field.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La0.7915Ce0.0085Y0.20 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.55 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La0.7915Ce0.0085Y0.20 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.27 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La0.7915Ce0.0085Y0.20 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.05 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Two-step flux penetration in classic antiferromagnetic superconductor
similarity 0.90T. Krzyszton & K. Rogacki · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110226
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Shiba states in systems with density of states singularities
similarity 0.89Surajit Basak & Andrzej Ptok · 2022 · arXiv:2203.17108
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoupling of superconducting layers in magnetic superconductor RuSr_{2}GdCu_{2}O_{8}
similarity 0.89Manuel Houzet et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures
similarity 0.89A. I. Buzdin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Overview of superconductivity in field-cooled magnetic materials
similarity 0.89Naoum Karchev · 2023 · arXiv:2308.00470
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of nodes, ellipticity and impurities on the spin resonance in Iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89S. Maiti et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.0266
Source status unknown — claims are unverified