← Back to search

Reentrant behavior of superconducting alloys

Dawid Borycki, Jan Maćkowiak

arXiv:1007.0476 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/24/3/035007 · 2010-07-03 · Superconductor Science and Technology

T1theoretical5 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A dirty BCS superconductor with magnetic impurities is studied. Asymptotic solution of the thermodynamics of such superconductor with spin $1/2$ and $7/2$ magnetic impurities, is found. To this end, the system's free energy $f(H, β)$ is bounded from above and below by mean-field type bounds, which are shown to coalesce almost exactly in the thermodynamic limit, provided the impurity concentration is sufficiently small. The resulting mean-field equations for the gap $Δ$ and a parameter $ν$, characterizing the impurity subsystem, are solved and the solution minimizing $f$ is found for various values of magnetic coupling constant $g$ and impurity concentration $x$. The phase diagrams of the system are depicted with five distinct phases: the normal phase, unperturbed superconducting phase, perturbed superconducting phase with nonzero gap in the excitation spectrum, perturbed gapless superconducting phase and impurity phase with completely suppressed superconductivity. Furthermore, evidence of reentrant superconductivity and Jaccarino-Peter compensation is found. The credibility of the theory is verified by testing the dependence of the superconducting transition temperature $T_{\text{c}}$ on $x$. Very good quantitative agreement with experimental data is obtained for several alloys: (La$_{1-x}$Ce$_{x}$)Al$_{2}$, (La$_{1-x}$Gd$_{x}$)Al$_{2}$ and (La$_{0.8-x}$Y$_{0.20}$)Ce$_{x}$. The theory presented improves earlier developments in this field.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La0.7915Ce0.0085Y0.20

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.55Pressure not reportedunknown
La0.7915Ce0.0085Y0.20

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.27Pressure not reportedunknown
La0.7915Ce0.0085Y0.20

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.05Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers