Centre-of-mass separation in quantum mechanics: Implications for the many-body treatment in quantum chemistry and solid state physics
Michal Svrcek
arXiv:1008.3968 · DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2076-3_28 · 2010-08-24 · arXiv: Chemical Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We address the question to what extent the centre-of-mass (COM) separation can change our view of the many-body problem in quantum chemistry and solid state physics. It was shown that the many-body treatment based on the electron-vibrational Hamiltonian is fundamentally inconsistent with the Born-Handy ansatz so that such a treatment can never respect the COM problem. Born-Oppenheimer (B-O) approximation reveals some secret: it is a limit case where the degrees of freedom can be treated in a classical way. Beyond the B-O approximation they are inseparable in principle. The unique covariant description of all equations with respect to individual degrees of freedom leads to new types of interaction: besides the known vibronic (electron-phonon) one the rotonic (electron-roton) and translonic (electron-translon) interactions arise. We have proved that due to the COM problem only the hypervibrations (hyperphonons, i.e. phonons + rotons + translons) have true physical meaning in molecules and crystals; nevertheless, the use of pure vibrations (phonons) is justified only in the adiabatic systems. This fact calls for the total revision of our contemporary knowledge of all non-adiabatic effects, especially the Jahn-Teller effect and superconductivity. The vibronic coupling is responsible only for removing of electron (quasi)degeneracies but for the explanation of symmetry breaking and forming of structure the rotonic and translonic coupling is necessary.
Similar papers
From local to macroscopic coherence in systems with composite quasi-particles
similarity 0.85J. Ranninger & A. Romano · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207189
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boson mediators of high-Tc superconductivity: Phonons versus composite bosons from the superconducting phenomenology
similarity 0.83G. Varelogiannis & L. Pietronero
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluidity of bosons on a deformable lattice
similarity 0.82G. Jackeli & J. Ranninger · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0103055
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle creation and condensation in a resonating-valence-bond superconductor
similarity 0.81E. J. Mele
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Study on the Conditions for Observing the Josephson Effect as a Method for Finding the Right Theory of Superconductivity
similarity 0.81I. M. Yurin · 2013 · arXiv:1305.2324
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron - Phonon Superconductivity
similarity 0.81F. Marsiglio & J. P. Carbotte · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106143
Source status unknown — claims are unverified