Effect of annealing on the specific heat of Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2
K. Gofryk, A. B. Vorontsov, I. Vekhter, A. S. Sefat, T. Imai, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, F. Ronning
arXiv:1009.1091 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.064513 · 2010-09-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on the effect of annealing on the temperature and field dependencies of the low temperature specific heat of the electron-doped Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$ for under-(x = 0.045), optimal- (x = 0.08) and over-doped (x = 0.105 and 0.14) regimes. We observed that annealing significantly improves some superconducting characteristics in Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$. It considerably increases $T_{c}$, decreases $γ_{0}$ in the superconducting state and suppresses the Schottky-like contribution at very low temperatures. The improved sample quality allows for a better identification of the superconducting gap structure of these materials. We examine the effects of doping and annealing within a self-consistent framework for an extended s-wave pairing scenario. At optimal doping our data indicates the sample is fully gapped, while for both under and overdoped samples significant low-energy excitations possibly consistent with a nodal structure remain. The difference of sample quality offers a natural explanation for the variation in low temperature power laws observed by many techniques.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba(Fe0.895Co0.105)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.895Co0.105)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.92Co0.08)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.92Co0.08)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.955Co0.045)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.955Co0.045)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.86Co0.14)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.86Co0.14)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.955Co0.045)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.955Co0.045)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.895Co0.105)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.895Co0.105)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of annealing on the specific heat of optimally doped Ba(FeCo)As
similarity 0.92K. Gofryk et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.0954
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Calorimetric Evidence of Multiband Superconductivity in Ba(Fe0.925Co0.075)2As2
similarity 0.91F. Hardy et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.5006
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting gap structure of BaFe_2(As_{1-x}P_{x})_2
similarity 0.91L. Malone et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.7523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodeless superconductivity in the presence of spin-density wave in pnictide superconductors: The case of BaFeNiAs
similarity 0.91Mahmoud Abdel-Hafiez et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1501.01655
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Energy Gap Evolution Across the Superconductivity Dome in Single Crystals of (BaK)FeAs
similarity 0.90Kyuil Cho et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.04183
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal expansion and anisotropic pressure derivatives of T_c in Ba(Fe_{1-x}Co_x)_2As_2 single crystals
similarity 0.90S. L. Bud'ko et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.1800
Source status unknown — claims are unverified