Lifshitz critical point in the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3Oy from high-field Hall effect measurements
David LeBoeuf, Nicolas Doiron-Leyraud, B. Vignolle, Mike Sutherland, B. J. Ramshaw, J. Levallois, R. Daou, Francis Laliberté, Olivier Cyr-Choinière, Johan Chang, Y. J. Jo, L. Balicas, Ruixing Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, Cyril Proust, Louis Taillefer
arXiv:1009.2078 · 2010-09-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Hall coefficient R_H of the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3Oy was measured in magnetic fields up to 60 T for a hole concentration p from 0.078 to 0.152, in the underdoped regime. In fields large enough to suppress superconductivity, R_H(T) is seen to go from positive at high temperature to negative at low temperature, for p > 0.08. This change of sign is attributed to the emergence of an electron pocket in the Fermi surface at low temperature. At p < 0.08, the normal-state R_H(T) remains positive at all temperatures, increasing monotonically as T \to 0. We attribute the change of behaviour across p = 0.08 to a Lifshitz transition, namely a change in Fermi-surface topology occurring at a critical concentration p_L = 0.08, where the electron pocket vanishes. The loss of the high-mobility electron pocket across p_L coincides with a ten-fold drop in the conductivity at low temperature, revealed in measurements of the electrical resistivity $ρ$ at high fields, showing that the so-called metal-insulator crossover of cuprates is in fact driven by a Lifshitz transition. It also coincides with a jump in the in-plane anisotropy of $ρ$, showing that without its electron pocket the Fermi surface must have strong two-fold in-plane anisotropy. These findings are consistent with a Fermi-surface reconstruction caused by a unidirectional spin-density wave or stripe order.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 47 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 62 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 44.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 49.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 51 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 53 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 57.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 61.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 66 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 74.8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 77.9 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91.1 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 93 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Lifshitz critical point in the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3Oy from high-field Hall effect measurements
similarity 0.92David LeBoeuf et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi-surface reconstruction in a smectic phase of a high temperature superconductor
similarity 0.90Hong Yao et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1103.2115
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vorticity and the Nernst Effect in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.90N. P. Ong et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312213
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst and Seebeck Coefficients of the Cuprate SuperconductorYBaCuO: A Study of Fermi Surface Reconstruction
similarity 0.90J. Chang et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.5039
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent c-axis transport in the underdoped cuprate superconductor YBCO
similarity 0.90B. Vignolle et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.5422
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap temperature of cuprate superconductors from the Nernst effect
similarity 0.90O. Cyr-Choinière et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.06927
Source status unknown — claims are unverified