YBa2Cu3O7 grain boundary junctions and low-noise superconducting quantum interference devices patterned by a focused ion beam down to 80 nm linewidth
J. Nagel, K. B. Konovalenko, M. Kemmler, M. Turad, R. Werner, E. Kleisz, S. Menzel, R. Klingeler, B. Büchner, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle
arXiv:1009.2657 · 2010-09-14 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ 24$^\circ$ (30$^\circ$) bicrystal grain boundary junctions (GBJs), shunted with 60\,nm (20\,nm) thick Au, were fabricated by focused ion beam milling with widths $80\,{\rm nm} \le w \le 7.8\,μ$m. At 4.2\,K we find critical current densities $j_c$ in the $10^5\,{\rm A/cm^2}$ range %\dkc{\#1} (without a clear dependence on $w$) and an increase in resistance times junction area $ρ$ with an approximate scaling $ρ\propto w^{1/2}$. For the narrowest GBJs $j_cρ\approx 100\,μ$V, which is promising for the realization of sensitive nanoSQUIDs for the detection of small spin systems. We demonstrate that our fabrication process allows the realization of sensitive nanoscale dc SQUIDs; for a SQUID with $w\approx 100$\,nm wide GBJs we find an rms magnetic flux noise spectral density of $S_Φ^{1/2}\approx 4\,μΦ_0/{\rm Hz}^{1/2}$ in the white noise limit. We also derive an expression for the spin sensitivity $S_μ^{1/2}$, which depends on $S_Φ^{1/2}$, on the location and orientation of the magnetic moment of a magnetic particle to be detected by the SQUID, and on the SQUID geometry. For the not optimized SQUIDs presented here, we estimate $S_μ^{1/2}=390\,μ_B/\sqrt{\rm{Hz}}$, which could be further improved by at least an order of magnitude.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Optimizing the spin sensitivity of grain boundary junction nanoSQUIDs -- towards detection of small spin systems with single-spin resolution
similarity 0.91Roman Wölbing et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.1189
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Observation of a Temperature Dependent 0-pi Junction Transition in a Mesoscopic High Critical Temperature Grain Boundary Junction
similarity 0.91G. Testa et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Junctions and SQUIDs Created by Focused Helium-Ion-Beam Irradiation of YBa2Cu3O7
similarity 0.90B. Müller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NanoSQUIDs from YBaCuO/SrTiO superlattices with bicrystal grain boundary Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90J. Lin et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.11046
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Soft nanostructuring of YBCO Josephson Junctions by phase separation
similarity 0.90David Gustafsson et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.2841
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson-like behavior in YBaCuO nano-bridges carrying the depairing current
similarity 0.90Shahid Nawaz et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.4882
Source status unknown — claims are unverified