Trapped electron coupled to superconducting devices
P. Bushev, D. Bothner, J. Nagel, M. Kemmler, K. B. Konovalenko, A. Loerincz, K. Ilin, M. Siegel, D. Koelle, R. Kleiner, F. Schmidt-Kaler
arXiv:1009.3425 · 2010-09-17
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We propose to couple a trapped single electron to superconducting structures located at a variable distance from the electron. The electron is captured in a cryogenic Penning trap using electric fields and a static magnetic field in the Tesla range. Measurements on the electron will allow investigating the properties of the superconductor such as vortex structure, damping and decoherence. We propose to couple a superconducting microwave resonator to the electron in order to realize a circuit QED-like experiment, as well as to couple superconducting Josephson junctions or superconducting quantum interferometers (SQUIDs) to the electron. The electron may also be coupled to a vortex which is situated in a double well potential, realized by nearby pinning centers in the superconductor, acting as a quantum mechanical two level system that can be controlled by a transport current tilting the double well potential. When the vortex is trapped in the interferometer arms of a SQUID, this would allow its detection both by the SQUID and by the electron.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
NanoSQUIDs from YBaCuO/SrTiO superlattices with bicrystal grain boundary Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90J. Lin et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.11046
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Vortex Logic Antidots
similarity 0.90C. J. Olson Reichhardt et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307596
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-transition-temperature superconducting quantum interference devices
similarity 0.89D. Koelle et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced superconducting circuits and devices
similarity 0.89Martin Weides & Hannes Rotzinger · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced vortex pinning by a composite antidot lattice in a superconducting Pb film
similarity 0.89A. V. Silhanek et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise properties of nanoscale YBCO Josephson junctions
similarity 0.88David Gustafsson et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.0680
Source status unknown — claims are unverified