Self-consistent Eliashberg theory, Tc, and the gap function in electron-doped cuprates
Dhananjay Dhokarh, Andrey V. Chubukov
arXiv:1010.0994 · 2010-10-05
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider normal state properties, the pairing instability temperature, and the structure of the pairing gap in electron-doped cuprates. We assume that the pairing is mediated by collective spin excitations, with antiferromagnetism emerging with the appearance of hot spots. We use a low-energy spin-fermion model and Eliashberg theory up to two-loop order. We justify ignoring vertex corrections by extending the model to N >>1 fermionic flavors, with 1/N playing the role of a small Eliashberg parameter. We argue, however, that it is still necessary to solve coupled integral equations for the frequency dependent fermionic and bosonic self-energies, both in the normal and superconducting state. Using the solution of the coupled equations, we find an onset of d-wave pairing at Tc ~ 30 K, roughly three times larger than the one obtained previously [P. Krotkov and A. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. B 74, 014509 (2006)], where it was assumed that the equations for fermionic and bosonic self-energies decouple in the normal state. To obtain the momentum and frequency dependent d-wave superconducting gap D(k,w), we derive and solve the non-linear gap equation together with the modified equation for the bosonic self energy which below Tc depends on the pairing gap. We find that the gap is a non-monotonic function of momentum along the Fermi surface, with its node along the zone diagonal and its maximum some distance away from it. We obtain 2D/Tc ~ 4. We argue that the value of Tc, the non-monotonicity of the gap, and 2D/Tc ratio are all in good agreement with the experimental data on electron-doped cuprates.
Similar papers
Defect-engineered, universal kinematic correlations between superconductivity and Fermi liquid transport
similarity 0.90M. ElMassalami & M. B. Silva Neto · 2019 · arXiv:1904.04773
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine learning the relationship between Debye temperature and superconducting transition temperature
similarity 0.89Adam D. Smith et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.12977
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping and momentum dependence of coupling strength in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Yingping Mou et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.00803
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Asymptotically Exact Solution for Superconductivity near Ferromagnetic Criticality
similarity 0.89Satoshi Fujimoto · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401412
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Application of an Extended Eliashberg Theory to High-T_c Cuprates
similarity 0.89E. Schachinger & J. P. Carbotte · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207668
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Understanding electron-doped cuprate superconductors as hole superconductors
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2019 · arXiv:1904.09164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified