Comment on "Composite excitation of Josephson phase and spin waves in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions" (S.Hikino, M.Mori, S.Takahashi, and S.Maekawa, arXiv:1009.3551)
A. F. Volkov
arXiv:1010.2680 · 2010-10-13
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We clarify the applicability of the quasistatic approximation used in Ref. [\onlinecite{VE}], where coupled spin and Josephson plasma waves have been predicted to exist in SIFS Josephson junctions. We show, contrary to the claim of the authors of Ref. [\onlinecite{Maekawa}], that this approximation is very accurate in realistic systems studied experimentally.
Similar papers
Spin waves and high-frequency response in layered superconductors with helical magnetic structure
similarity 0.88A. E. Koshelev · 2021 · arXiv:2102.12445
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Radiation From Flux Flow In Josephson Junction Structures
similarity 0.88Bulaevskii, L. N. & Koshelev, A. E. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin and Current Variations in Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.88A. Shnirman et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0402548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetoanisotropic Josephson effect due to interfacial spin-orbit fields in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.88Andreas Costa et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.01218
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interaction of Josephson and magnetic oscillations in Josephson tunnel junctions with a ferromagnetic layer
similarity 0.88S. Mai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range spin current driven by superconducting phase difference in a Josephson junction with double layer ferromagnets
similarity 0.88S. Hikino & S. Yunoki · 2013 · arXiv:1304.6452
Source status unknown — claims are unverified