Wirebond crosstalk and cavity modes in large chip mounts for superconducting qubits
J. Wenner, M. Neeley, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, M. Lenander, Erik Lucero, A. D. O'Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, A. N. Cleland, John M. Martinis
arXiv:1011.4982 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/24/6/065001 · 2010-11-23 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the performance of a microwave chip mount that uses wirebonds to connect the chip and mount grounds. A simple impedance ladder model predicts that transmission crosstalk between two feedlines falls off exponentially with distance at low frequencies, but rises to near unity above a resonance frequency set by the chip to ground capacitance. Using SPICE simulations and experimental measurements of a scale model, the basic predictions of the ladder model were verified. In particular, by decreasing the capacitance between the chip and box grounds, the resonance frequency increased and transmission decreased. This model then influenced the design of a new mount that improved the isolation to -65 dB at 6 GHz, even though the chip dimensions were increased to 1 cm by 1 cm, 3 times as large as our previous devices. We measured a coplanar resonator in this mount as preparation for larger qubit chips, and were able to identify cavity, slotline, and resonator modes.
Similar papers
In-situ tunable nonlinearity and competing signal paths in coupled superconducting resonators
similarity 0.87Michael Fischer et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.13492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of loss in superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators
similarity 0.86Jeremy M. Sage et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.6063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analysis of Superconducting Qubit Layouts Using InductEx
similarity 0.86Sean Crowe et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.07336
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Resonators with Parasitic Electromagnetic Environments
similarity 0.85J. M. Hornibrook et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.4442
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigating coherent leakage of superconducting qubits in a large-scale quantum socket
similarity 0.85T. G. McConkey et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.04590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting quantum fluctuations in one dimension
similarity 0.85Andrew G. Semenov & Andrei D. Zaikin · 2022 · arXiv:2204.07477
Source status unknown — claims are unverified