← Back to search

Strong nodeless pairing on separate electron Fermi surface sheets in (Tl, K)Fe$_{1.78}$Se$_2$ probed by ARPES

X. -P. Wang, T. Qian, P. Richard, P. Zhang, J. Dong, H. -D. Wang, C. -H. Dong, M. -H. Fang, H. Ding

arXiv:1101.4923 · DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/93/57001 · 2011-01-25 · EPL (Europhysics Letters)

T1theoretical98 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We performed a high-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy study of the Tl$_{0.63}$K$_{0.37}$Fe$_{1.78}$Se$_2$ superconductor ($T_c=29$ K). We show the existence of two electronlike bands at the M$(π, 0)$ point which cross the Fermi level at similar Fermi wave vectors to form nearly circular electronlike Fermi surface pockets. We observe a nearly isotropic $\sim$ 8.5 meV superconducting gap ($Δ/k_BT_c\sim 7$) on these Fermi surfaces. Our analysis of the band structure around the Brillouin zone centre reveals two additional electronlike Fermi surfaces: a very small one and a larger one with $k_F$ comparable to the FS pockets at M. Interestingly, a SC gap with a magnitude of $\sim$ 8 meV also develops along the latter FS. Our observations are consistent with the s-wave strong coupling scenario.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Tl0.63K0.37Fe1.78Se2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29.1Pressure not reportedonset
Tl0.63K0.37Fe1.78Se2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28.6Pressure not reportedmidpoint
Tl0.63K0.37Fe1.78Se2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

27.5Pressure not reportedzero_resistance

Similar papers