← Back to search

Possible high-temperature superconductivity in multilayer graphane: can the cuprates be beaten?

V. M. Loktev, V. Turkowski

arXiv:1102.4596 · DOI 10.1007/s10909-011-0376-7 · 2011-02-22 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics

T321 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We analyze a possible superconductivity in the hole-doped system of layered hydrogenized graphene by taking into account thermal fluctuations of the order parameter. In particular, we demonstrate that in the one-layer case the values of the high mean-field (MF) critical temperature $T_{c}^{MF}\sim 80-90K$, predicted recently by Savini et al \cite{Savini}, do not alter significantly due to the fluctuations, and the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) critical temperature of the vortex superconductivity is almost the same as the MF temperature at doping 0.01-0.1. We show that in the case of multilayer system, when the coupling between the layers stabilizes the superconducting phase in the form of fluxon superconductivity, the critical temperature $T_{c}$ can increase dramatically to the values $\sim 150K$, higher than the corresponding values in cuprates under ambient pressure.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

80Pressure not reportedunknown
CH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown
CH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

150Pressure not reportedunknown
CH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers