← Back to search

Eliashberg approach to superconductivity-induced infrared anomalies in Ba0.68K0.32Fe2As2

A. Charnukha, O. V. Dolgov, A. A. Golubov, Y. Matiks, D. L. Sun, C. T. Lin, B. Keimer, A. V. Boris

arXiv:1103.0938 · 2011-03-04

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the full complex dielectric function of high-purity $\textrm{Ba}_{0.68}\textrm{K}_{0.32}\textrm{Fe}_2\textrm{As}_2$ single crystals with $T_{\mathrm{c}}=38.5\ \textrm{K}$ determined by wide-band spectroscopic ellipsometry at temperatures $10\leq T\leq300\ \textrm{K}$. We discuss the microscopic origin of superconductivity-induced infrared optical anomalies in the framework of a multiband Eliashberg theory with two distinct superconducting gap energies $2Δ_{\mathrm{A}}\approx6\ k_{\mathrm{B}}T_{\mathrm{c}}$ and $2Δ_{\mathrm{B}}\approx2.2\ k_{\mathrm{B}}T_{\mathrm{c}}$. The observed unusual suppression of the optical conductivity in the superconducting state at energies up to $14\ k_{\mathrm{B}}T_{\mathrm{c}}$ can be ascribed to spin-fluctuation--assisted processes in the clean limit of the strong-coupling regime.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba0.68K0.32Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba0.68K0.32Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba0.68K0.32Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba0.68K0.32Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers