Magnetic field - dependent Labusch parameter in LiFeAs superconductor from Campbell penetration depth
Plengchart Prommapan, Makariy A. Tanatar, Bumsung Lee, Seunghyun Khim, Kee Hoon Kim, Ruslan Prozorov
arXiv:1103.1398 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.060509 · 2011-03-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A true critical current density, $j_{c}$, as opposite to commonly measured relaxed persistent (Bean) current, $j_{B}$, was extracted from the Campbell penetration depth, $λ_{C}(T,H)$ measured in single crystals of LiFeAs. The effective pinning potential is non-parabolic, which follows from the magnetic field - dependent Labusch parameter $α$. At the equilibrium (upon field - cooling), $α(H)$ is non-monotonic, but it is monotonic at a finite gradient of the vortex density. This behavior leads to a faster magnetic relaxation at the lower fields and provides a natural \emph{dynamic} explanation for the fishtail (second peak) effect. We also find the evidence for strong pinning at the lower fields. The inferred field dependence of the pinning potential is consistent with the evolution from strong pinning, through collective pinning and, eventually, to a disordered vortex lattice. The values of $j_{c}(2\text{K}) \simeq 2\times10^{6}$ A/cm$^{2}$ provide an upper estimate of the current carrying capability of LiFeAs. Overall, vortex behavior of almost isotropic, fully-gapped LiFeAs is very similar to highly anisotropic d-wave cuprate superconductors, the similarity that requires further studies in order to understand unconventional superconductivity in cuprates and pnictides.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic-field-dependent pinning potential in LiFeAs superconductor from its Campbell penetration depth
similarity 0.94Plengchart Prommapan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Long-Range Magnetic Order and Superconductivity from Campbell Penetration Depth Measurements
similarity 0.91R. Prozorov et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0809.3154
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Campbell penetration depth in low carrier density superconductor YPtBi
similarity 0.90Hyunsoo Kim et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.05908
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonequilibrium Campbell length: probing the vortex pinning potential
similarity 0.90R. Prozorov et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0004122
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Campbell penetration depth in a single crystal of heavy fermion superconductor CeCoIn
similarity 0.89Hyunsoo Kim et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.23657
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conventional s-wave superconductivity and hidden peak effect in single crystals of MoGa superconductor
similarity 0.89Sunil Ghimire et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.05493
Source status unknown — claims are unverified