← Back to search

Surface and bulk electronic structure of unconventional superconductor Sr_2RuO_4: unusual splitting of the beta-band

V. B. Zabolotnyy, E. Carleschi, T. K. Kim, A. A. Kordyuk, J. Trinckauf, J. Geck, D. V. Evtushinsky, B. P. Doyle, R. Fittipaldi, M. Cuoco, A. Vecchione, B. Buchner, S. V. Borisenko

arXiv:1103.6196 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/14/6/063039 · 2011-03-31 · New Journal of Physics

T1theoretical14 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present an angle resolved photoemission study of the surface and bulk electronic structure of the single layer ruthenate Sr$_2$RuO$_4$. As the early studies of its electronic structure by photoemission and scanning tunneling microscopy were confronted with a problem of surface reconstruction, surface aging was previously proposed as a possible remedy to access the bulk states. Here we suggest an alternative way by demonstrating that, in the case of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, circularly polarised light can be used to disentangle the signals from the bulk and surface layers, thus opening the possibility of investigating many-body interactions both in bulk and surface bands. The proposed procedure results in improved momentum resolution, which enabled us to detect an unexpected splitting of the surface $β$ band. We propose that spin--orbit splitting might be responsible for this, and discuss possible relations of the newly observed surface feature to topological matter.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.34Pressure not reportedunknown
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.34Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers