Spin Waves and magnetic exchange interactions in insulating Rb$_{0.89}$Fe$_{1.58}$Se$_2$
Miaoyin Wang, Chen Fang, Dao-Xin Yao, GuoTai Tan, Leland W. Harriger, Yu Song, Tucker Netherton, Chenglin Zhang, Meng Wang, Matthew B. Stone, Wei Tian, Jiangping Hu, Pengcheng Dai
arXiv:1105.4675 · DOI 10.1038/ncomms1573 · 2011-05-24 · Nature communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The discovery of alkaline iron selenide $A$Fe$_{1.6+x}$Se$_2$ ($A=$ K, Rb, Cs) superconductors has generated considerable excitement in the condensed matter physics community because superconductivity in these materials may have a different origin from the sign reversed s-wave electron pairing mechanism, a leading candidate proposed for all other Fe-based superconductors. Although $A$Fe$_{1.6+x}$Se$_2$ are isostructural with the metallic antiferromagnetic (AF) iron pnictides such as (Ba,Ca,Sr)Fe$_2$As$_2$, they are insulators near $x=0$ and form a $\sqrt{5}\times\sqrt{5}$ blocked AF structure (Fig. 1a) completely different from the iron pnictides. If magnetism is responsible for superconductivity of all iron-based materials, it is important to determine their common magnetic features. Here we use neutron scattering to map out spin waves in the AF insulating Rb$_{0.89}$Fe$_{1.58}$Se$_2$. We find that although Rb$_{0.89}$Fe$_{1.58}$Se$_2$ has a N$\rm \acute{e}$el temperature ($T_N=475$ K) much higher than that of the iron pnictides ($T_N\leq 220$ K), spin waves for both classes of materials have similar zone boundary energies. A comparison of the fitted effective exchange couplings using a local moment Heisenberg Hamiltonian in Rb$_{0.89}$Fe$_{1.58}$Se$_2$, (Ba,Ca,Sr)Fe$_2$As$_2$, and iron chalcogenide Fe$_{1.05}$Te reveals that their next nearest neighbor (NNN) exchange couplings are similar. Therefore, superconductivity in all Fe-based materials may have a common magnetic origin that is intimately associated with the NNN magnetic exchange interactions, even though they have metallic or insulating ground states, different AF orders and electronic band structures.
Similar papers
Spin resonance in AFe2Se2 with s-wave pairing symmetry
similarity 0.92S. Pandey et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.2334
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Complete renormalization group calculation up to two-loop order of an effective two-band model for iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.92Vanuildo S. de Carvalho & Hermann Freire · 2011 · arXiv:1105.4897
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic spin excitations in single crystals of nonsuperconducting Li1-xFeAs
similarity 0.91Meng Wang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1104.3653
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Unexpected Properties of Alkali Metal Iron Selenide Superconductors
similarity 0.91Elbio Dagotto · 2012 · arXiv:1210.6501
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic order and superlattice structure in nonsuperconducting and superconducting RbyFe(1.6+x)Se2
similarity 0.90Meng Wang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.2895
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Gap and Resonance at the Nesting Wavevector in Superconducting FeSe0.4Te0.6
similarity 0.90Yiming Qiu et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0905.3559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified