Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases in superconductors without inversion symmetry
D. F. Agterberg
arXiv:1106.0352 · DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24624-1_5 · 2011-06-02 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
This chapter emphasizes new magnetic properties that arise when inversion symmetry is broken in a superconductor. There are two aspects that will be covered in detail. The first topic encompasses physics related to superconducting magnetoelectric effects that arise from broken inversion symmetry. Broken inversion symmetry allow for Lifshitz invariants in the free energy which can be viewed as a coupling between the magnetic induction and the supercurrent. There are similarities between these invariants and the better known Dzyaloshinskii-Moyira interaction in magnetic systems. These Lifshitz invariants give rise to anomalous magnetic properties as well as new phases in the presence of magnetic fields. Here, we will describe the consequences of these Lifshitz invariants, provide estimates for the relative magnitudes of the novel effects, and discuss the important role that crystal symmetry plays in understanding this physics. Finally, we provide a discussion of the fate of Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) phases in broken inversion superconductors. In particular, we show how broken inversion symmetry can have a profound effect on the stability, existence, and properties of FFLO phases.
Similar papers
Phase transitions in the domain structure of ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.91I. M. Khaymovich et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1401.2806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Helical states and solitons in noncentrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.90K. V. Samokhin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagrams of the superconducting diode effect in topological hybrid structures
similarity 0.90T. Karabassov et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.00549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonuniform states in noncentrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.90V. P. Mineev & K. V. Samokhin · 2008 · arXiv:0807.3021
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Josephson Hall effect in doped topological insulators with the nematic superconductivity
similarity 0.89R. S. Akzyanov & A. L. Rakhmanov · 2022 · arXiv:2204.06888
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of weakly coupled superconducting multilayers in an external magnetic field
similarity 0.89Sergey V. Kuplevakhsky · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9812277
Source status unknown — claims are unverified