Controlling Excitations Inversion of a Cooper Pair Box Interacting with a Nanomechanical Resonator
C. Valverde, A. T. Avelar, B. Baseia
arXiv:1106.3379 · DOI 10.1088/0256-307X/29/8/080303 · 2011-06-17 · Chinese Physics Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the action of time dependent detunings upon the excitation inversion of a Cooper pair box interacting with a nanomechanical resonator. The method employs the Jaynes-Cummings model with damping, assuming different decay rates of the Cooper pair box and various fixed and t-dependent detunings. It is shown that while the presence of damping plus constant detunings destroy the collapse/revival effects, convenient choices of time dependent detunings allow one to reconstruct such events in a perfect way. It is also shown that the mean excitation of the nanomechanical resonator is more robust against damping of the Cooper pair box for convenient values of t-dependent detunings.
Similar papers
Nonlinear nanoelectromechanics of a movable Cooper-pair box
similarity 0.93S. Park et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2608.05012
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rapid state purification protocols for a Cooper pair box
similarity 0.89E. J. Griffith et al. · 2006 · arXiv:quant-ph/0610044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the quantum coherence of a nanomechanical resonator using a superconducting qubit II: Implementation
similarity 0.89M. P. Blencowe & A. D. Armour · 2008 · arXiv:0804.2179
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Guidance and Control in a Josephson Charge Qubit
similarity 0.88J. F. Ralph et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0408356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Physics of the Majorana-superconducting qubit hybrids
similarity 0.88D. B. Karki et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.08758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum state engineering with Josephson-junction devices
similarity 0.88Yuriy Makhlin et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0011269
Source status unknown — claims are unverified