← Back to search

Transport and spectroscopic properties of superconductor - ferromagnet - superconductor junctions of $La_{1.9}Sr_{0.1}CuO_4$ - $La_{0.67}Ca_{0.33}MnO_3$ - $La_{1.9}Sr_{0.1}CuO_4$

Gad Koren, Tal Kirzhner

arXiv:1107.0806 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.134517 · 2011-07-05 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical2 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Transport and Conductance spectra measurements of ramp-type junctions made of cuprate superconducting $La_{1.9}Sr_{0.1}CuO_4$ electrodes and a manganite ferromagnetic $La_{0.67}Ca_{0.33}MnO_3$ barrier are reported. At low temperatures below $T_c$, the conductance spectra show Andreev-like broad peaks superposed on a tunneling-like background, and sometimes also sub-gap Andreev resonances. The energy gap values $Δ$ found from fits of the data ranged mostly between 7-10 mV. As usual, the gap features were suppressed under magnetic fields but revealed the tunneling-like conductance background. After field cycling to 5 or 6 T and back to 0 T, the conductance spectra were always higher than under zero field cooling, reflecting the negative magnetoresistance of the manganite barrier. A signature of superparamagnetism was found in the conductance spectra of junctions with a 12 nm thick LCMO barrier. Observed critical currents with barrier thickness of 12 nm or more, were shown to be an artifact due to incomplete milling of one of the superconducting electrodes.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.9Sr0.1CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

23Pressure not reportedonset
La1.9Sr0.1CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers