75As NMR-NQR study in superconducting LiFeAs
Seung-Ho Baek, Hans-Joachim Grafe, Franziska Hammerath, Madeleine Fuchs, Christian Rudisch, Luminita Harnagea, Saicharan Aswartham, Sabine Wurmehl, Jeroen van den Brink, Bernd Büchner
arXiv:1108.2592 · DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2012-30164-5 · 2011-08-12 · The European Physical Journal B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report results of 75As nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) experiments as well as 7Li NMR on different samples of self flux grown LiFeAs and 5 % Co doped LiFeAs single crystals, and a polycrystalline LiFeAs sample. We were able to distinguish the samples by their slightly different quadrupole frequencies, $ν_Q$, which is a direct measure of the electric field gradient (EFG) at the As site. Interestingly, samples with a large quadrupole frequency appear to show a different Knight shift and spin lattice relaxation in the superconducting state from those with a lower $ν_Q$, yet all the samples are clearly superconducting. For sample S1 which has the largest $ν_Q$, we find constant Knight shift K across Tc for a certain direction of the magnetic field and a peculiar upturn of the NQR spin lattice relaxation rate 1/T1 below Tc. In contrast, samples with a lower $ν_Q$ exhibit the expected behavior for a singlet superconductor: a drop of K and 1/T1 for both NMR and NQR below Tc. Our results show that already tiny changes in stoichiometry uncovered by slightly different NQR frequencies lead to very different behavior of the NMR parameters in the superconducting state of LiFeAs. Different possibilities will be discussed which may explain the contrasting behavior.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Anomalous superconducting state in LiFeAs implied by the As Knight shift measurement
similarity 0.92S. -H. Baek et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1211.1594
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Commensurate Itinerant Antiferromagnetism in BaFe2As2: 75As-NMR Studies on a Self-Flux Grown Single Crystal
similarity 0.92Kentaro Kitagawa et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.4613
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR measurements of intrinsic spin susceptibility in LaFeAsO(0.9)F(0.1)
similarity 0.91T. Imai et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.0305
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
NMR investigation of spin correlations in BaCo2As2
similarity 0.91K. Ahilan et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1407.2750
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Fluctuation-Induced Non-Fermi-Liquid Behavior with suppressed superconductivity in LiFeCoAs
similarity 0.91Y. M. Dai et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1505.00455
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic fluctuations in the normal state of LiFeAs
similarity 0.91P. Jeglic et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.0692
Source status unknown — claims are unverified