Reply to Comment by Borisenko et al. on article `A de Haas-van Alphen study of the Fermi surfaces of superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs'
C. Putzke, A. I. Coldea, I. Guillamon, D. Vignolles, A. McCollam, D. LeBoeuf, M. D. Watson, I. I. Mazin, S. Kasahara, T. Terashima, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, A. Carrington
arXiv:1108.3956 · 2011-08-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, Borisenko et al have posted a Comment (arXiv:1108.1159) where they suggest an alternative interpretation of our de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) measurements on the superconductor LiFeAs. In our original paper (arXiv:1107.4375) we concluded that our measurements of the bulk Fermi surface were not consistent with the surface bands observed thus far by ARPES. Borisenko et al dispute this and suggest the two measurements are consistent if some of the orbits we observe are due to magnetic breakdown. We argue here that this scenario is inconsistent with the experimental data and therefore that our original conclusion stands.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaFePO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrFe2P2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2P2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
A de Haas-van Alphen study of the Fermi surfaces of superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs
similarity 0.88C. Putzke et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.4375
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on "A de Haas-van Alphen study of the Fermi surfaces of superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs"
similarity 0.87S. V. Borisenko et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.1159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak superconducting pairing and a single isotropic energy gap in stoichiometric LiFeAs
similarity 0.87Inosov, D. S. et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.3806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
de Haas–van Alphen Study of the Fermi Surfaces of Superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs
similarity 0.87C. Putzke et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The absence of surface states for LiFeAs
similarity 0.86Alexander Lankau et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.5234
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for bosonic mode coupling in electron dynamics of LiFeAs superconductor
similarity 0.86Cong Li et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.10911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified