← Back to search

Study of the magnetic state of K$_{0.8}$Fe$_{1.6}$Se$_2$ using the five-orbital Hubbard model in the Hartree-Fock approximation

Qinlong Luo, Andrew Nicholson, José Riera, Dao-Xin Yao, Adriana Moreo, Elbio Dagotto

arXiv:1108.5807 · 2011-08-30

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Motivated by the recent discovery of Fe-based superconductors close to an antiferromagnetic insulator in the experimental phase diagram, here the five-orbital Hubbard model (without lattice distortions) is studied using the real-space Hartree-Fock approximation, employing a 10x10 Fe cluster with Fe vacancies in a $\sqrt{5}x\sqrt{5}$ pattern. Varying the Hubbard and Hund couplings, and at electronic density $n$=6.0, the phase diagram contains an insulating state with the same spin pattern as observed experimentally, involving 2x2 ferromagnetic plaquettes coupled with one another antiferromagnetically. The presence of local ferromagnetic tendencies is in qualitative agreement with Lanczos results for the three-orbital model also reported here. The magnetic moment ~ 3$μ_B$/Fe is in good agreement with experiments. Several other phases are also stabilized in the phase diagram, in agreement with recent calculations using phenomenological models.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
K0.8Fe2-xSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown
(Tl,K)Fe2-xSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown
(Tl,K)Fe1.78Se2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers