Validity of resonant two-qubit gates in the ultrastrong coupling regime of circuit QED
Y. M. Wang, D. Ballester, G. Romero, V. Scarani, E. Solano
arXiv:1109.1305 · DOI 10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T147/014031 · 2011-09-06 · Physica Scripta
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate theoretically the performance of two-qubit resonant gates in the crossover from the strong to the ultrastrong coupling (USC) regime of light-matter interaction in circuit QED. Two controlled-PHASE gate schemes---that works well within the rotating wave-approximation (RWA)---are analyzed while taking into account the effects of counter-rotating terms appearing in the Hamiltonian. Our numerical results show that the fidelity of the gate operation is above 96 % when the ratio between the coupling strength and the resonator frequency, g/ω_r, is of about 10 %. Novel schemes are required in order to implement ultrafast quantum gates when increasing the ratio g/ω_r.
Similar papers
Two-resonator circuit QED: A superconducting quantum switch
similarity 0.89Matteo Mariantoni et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.2522
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A proposal for realizing a 3-qubit controlled-phase gate with superconducting qubit systems coupled to a cavity
similarity 0.89Chui-Ping Yang · 2012 · arXiv:1208.1345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Toolbox of resonant quantum gates in Circuit QED
similarity 0.89G. Haack et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0908.3673
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent controlization using superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89Nicolai Friis et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.00447
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultrafast Quantum Gates in Circuit QED
similarity 0.88G. Romero et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.0223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction
similarity 0.88P. Forn-Díaz et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.09275
Source status unknown — claims are unverified