Angular dependenceof the magnetisation AC loss: coated conductors, Roebel cables and double pancake coils
Enric Pardo, Francesco Grilli
arXiv:1109.2747 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/25/1/014008 · 2011-09-13 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The AC loss in ReBCO coated conductors is large in situations when the conductors are subjected to a considerable magnetic field, like in rotating machines, transformers and high-field magnets. Roebel cables can reduce the AC loss in these cases. However, computer simulations are needed to interpret the experiments, understand the loss mechanisms, reduce the AC loss by optimising the Roebel cable and design the cryogenic system. In this article, we simulate and discuss the AC loss due to an applied magnetic field making an arbitrary angle with the cable and taking into account a realistic anisotropic field dependence of the critical current density. We study the AC loss in the superconductor parts for the limits of very high coupling currents and completely uncoupled strands. The simulations for the uncoupled case also describe a double pancake coil with no transport current. For the simulations, we use two different numerical methods with complementary strengths. This serves as a mutual check of the correctness of the simulation results, which agree to each other. Opposite than expected, we found that the AC loss does not only depend on the perpendicular component of the applied magnetic field. We also found that the AC loss for applied fields with an orientation below 7 degrees with the strands surface is reduced more than one order of magnitude comparing to an untransposed cable. Therefore, we recommend to use Roebel cables for windings with important parallel components of the magnetic field, such as transformers and high-field magnets.
Similar papers
Self-consistent Modeling of the of HTS Devices: How Accurate do Models Really Need to Be?
similarity 0.88Francesco Grilli et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1405.5316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
DC and AC Characterization of Pancake Coils Made from Roebel-Assembled Coated Conductor Cable
similarity 0.88Anna Kario et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1408.0616
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
AC loss in ReBCO pancake coils and stacks of them: modelling and measurement
similarity 0.88E. Pardo et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.2526
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-field Effects and AC Losses in Pancake Coils Assembled from Coated Conductor Roebel Cables
similarity 0.87Francesco Grilli et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1309.3388
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Review of the AC Loss Computation for HTS using the H-formulation
similarity 0.87Boyang Shen et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.02176
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Computation of Losses in HTS Under the Action of Varying Magnetic Fields and Currents
similarity 0.87Francesco Grilli et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1306.6251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified