← Back to search

Inter-layer Superconducting Pairing Induced c-axis Nodal Lines in Iron-based Superconductors

Yuehua Su, Chandan Setty, Ziqiang Wang, Jiangping Hu

arXiv:1110.0695 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.184517 · 2011-10-04 · Physical Review B

T38 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A layered superconductor with a full pairing energy gap can be driven into a nodal superconducting (SC) state by inter-layer pairing when the SC state becomes more quasi-3D. We propose that this mechanism is responsible for the observed nodal behavior in a class of iron-based SCs. We show that the intra- and inter-layer pairings generally compete and the gap nodes develop on one of the {\em hole} Fermi surface pockets as they become larger in the iron-pnictides. Our results provide a natural explanation of the c-axis gap modulations and gap nodes observed by angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Moreover, we predict that an anti-correlated c-axis gap modulations on the hole and electron pockets should be observable in the $S^{\pm}$-wave pairing state.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BaFe2As2-xPx

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
BaFe2As1.7P0.3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
KFe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba1-xKxFe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers