Microwave Surface Impedance Measurements of the Electronic State and Dissipation of Magnetic Vortices in Superconducting Iron-Based LiFeAs Single Crystals
T. Okada, H. Takahashi, Y. Imai, K. Kitagawa, K. Matsubayashi, Y. Uwatoko, A. Maeda
arXiv:1110.6575 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.064516 · 2011-10-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
LiFeAs is one of the iron-based superconductors having multiple gaps with the possible sign reversal. To clarify how those novel natures affect the energy dissipation of magnetic vortices, we investigated the microwave surface impedance of LiFeAs single crystals under finite magnetic fields. The flux-flow resistivity enhanced rapidly at low magnetic fields, which is similar to the case of MgB$_{2}$. This is probably the consequence of the multiple-gap nature and the gap anisotropy. This suggest that the sign-reversal is not important for the flux-flow even for multiple-gap superconductors. As for the electronic state, the vortex core of LiFeAs turned out to be "moderately clean". Furthermore, the mean free path inside the vortex core was much shorter than that outside, and was close to the core radius. These results strongly suggest a process specific to the core boundary is important for a scattering mechanism inside the vortex core.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaFeAsO1-xFx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Y2C3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
Similar papers
Microwave surface-impedance measurements of the electronic state and dissipation of magnetic vortices in superconducting LiFeAs single crystals
similarity 0.93T. Okada et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex state microwave response in superconducting cuprates and MgB
similarity 0.90Silva, E. et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607676
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave measurements of the high magnetic field vortex motion pinning parameters in NbSn
similarity 0.89Andrea Alimenti et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2008.11656
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave Surface Impedance Measurements of LiFeAs Single Crystals
similarity 0.89Yoshinori Imai et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.4628
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic vortex structure of Fe-based superconductors: application to LiFeAs
similarity 0.89B. Mencia Uranga et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.04453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux flow resistivity in the two-gap superconductivity
similarity 0.89Jun Goryo & Hiroshi Matsukawa · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0501284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified