Gap Symmetry in KFe_2As_2 and cos 4θgap component in LiFeAs
S. Maiti, M. M. Korshunov, A. V. Chubukov
arXiv:1111.0306 · 2011-11-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We revisit the issue of the gap symmetry in KFe2As2, which is an Fe-pnictide superconductor with only hole pockets. Previous theoretical studies mostly argued for a d-wave gap in KFe2As2 since transport and thermodynamic measurements point to the presence of the gap nodes. However, a d-wave gap is inconsistent with recent laser-based angle-resolved photoemission measurements. We propose the scenario for a nodal s-wave superconductivity induced by a non-magnetic intra-band and inter-band interactions between fermions near hole pockets. The superconducting gap changes sign between the hole pockets and has cos 4θangular dependence and accidental nodes on one or several hole pockets. We argue that strong angle dependence is the consequence of near-degeneracy between inter-pocket and intra-pocket interaction on the hole pockets. We also analyze cos 4θangular dependence of the gap in other Fe-pnictides and compare theoretical results with the photoemission experiments of LiFeAs.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting gap with sign reversal between hole pockets in heavily hole-doped Ba1-xKxFe2As2
similarity 0.90D. Watanabe et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1307.3408
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for superconducting gap nodes in the zone-centered hole bands of KFe2As2 from magnetic penetration-depth measurements
similarity 0.90K. Hashimoto et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.6022
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal superconducting gap structure in ferropnictide superconductor BaFe2(As0.7P0.3)2
similarity 0.89Y. Zhang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.0229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-Based Superconductors: A Decade of Materials, Magnetism, and Mechanisms
similarity 0.89Xingye Lu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.11355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible nodal superconducting gap emerging at the Lifshitz transition in heavily hole-doped Ba0.1K0.9Fe2As2
similarity 0.89N. Xu et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.3888
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting gap structure of FeSe
similarity 0.89Lin Jiao et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.01908
Source status unknown — claims are unverified