BCS ansatz for superconductivity in the canonical ensemble and the Pauli exclusion principle
G. Zhu, M. Combescot, O. Betbeder-Matibet
arXiv:1112.0188 · 2011-12-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The usual formulation of the BCS ansatz for superconductivity in the grand canonical ensemble makes the handling of the Pauli exclusion principle between paired electrons straightforward. It however tends to mask that many-body effects between Cooper pairs interacting through the reduced BCS potential are entirely controlled by this exclusion. To show it up, one has to work in the canonical ensemble. Pauli blocking between a fixed number of composite bosons is however known to be difficult to handle. To do it, we here develop a commutator formalism for Cooper pairs, along the line we used for excitons. We then rederive, within the $N$-pair subspace, a few results of BCS superconductivity commonly derived in the grand canonical ensemble, to evidence their Pauli blocking origin. We end by discussing what should be called "Cooper pair wave function".
Similar papers
What is a Cooper pair ?
similarity 0.91G. Ortiz & J. Dukelsky · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0604236
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-Cooper-pair problem and the Pauli exclusion principle
similarity 0.89W. V. Pogosov et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.1688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Order and quantum phase transitions in the cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Subir Sachdev · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211005
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From Cooper-pairs to resonating bipolarons
similarity 0.89Julius Ranninger · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606656
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS-to-BEC crossover from the exact BCS solution
similarity 0.89Gerardo Ortiz & Jorge Dukelsky · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503664
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper Pairing Revisited
similarity 0.89V. C. Aguilera-Navarro et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified