Edge superconductivity in Nb thin film microbridges revealed by integral and spatially resolved electric transport
R. Werner, A. Yu. Aladyshkin, I. M. Nefedov, A. V. Putilov, M. Kemmler, D. Bothner, A. Loerincz, K. Ilin, M. Siegel, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle
arXiv:1112.2256 · 2011-12-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The resistance $R$ vs perpendicular external magnetic field $H$ was measured for superconducting Nb thin--film microbridges with and without microholes [antidots (ADs)]. Well below the transition temperature, integral $R(H)$ measurements of the resistive transition to the normal state on the plain bridge show two distinct regions, which can be identified as bulk and edge superconductivity, respectively. The latter case appears when bulk superconductivity becomes suppressed at the upper critical field $H_{c2}$ and below the critical field of edge superconductivity $H_{c3}\approx 1.7\, H_{c2}$. The presence of additional edges in the AD bridge leads to a different shape of the $R(H)$ curves. We used low-temperature scanning laser microscopy (LTSLM) to visualize the current distribution in the plain and AD bridge upon sweeping $H$. While the plain bridge shows a dominant LTSLM signal at its edges for $H > H_{c2}$ the AD bridge also gives a signal from the inner parts of the bridge due to the additional edge states around the ADs. LTSLM reveals an asymmetry in the current distribution between left and right edges, which confirms theoretical predictions. Furthermore, the experimental results are in good agreement with our numerical simulations (based on the time-dependent Ginzburg--Landau model) yielding the spatial distribution of the order parameter and current density for different bias currents and $H$ values.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Vortices in a Ginzburg Landau Theory of Superconductors with Nematic Order
similarity 0.89Ramiro Sebastián Severino et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.07260
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in superconducting NbTiN films
similarity 0.89Alexey Yu. Mironov et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1707.09679
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau Framework for Sample-Specific Simulation of Superconductors for SRF Applications
similarity 0.89Aiden V. Harbick & Mark K. Transtrum · 2024 · arXiv:2410.20078
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlocal transport and heating in superconductors under dual-bias conditions
similarity 0.88S. Kolenda et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.5823
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical regimes of ultrafast kinematic vortices in the resistive state of mesoscopic superconductors
similarity 0.88A. Presotto et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.04893
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of Superconducting Critical Current Density by Small Flux Jumps in Thin Films
similarity 0.88Z. W. Zhao et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104249
Source status unknown — claims are unverified