Contrasts in electron correlations and inelastic scattering between LiFeAs and LiFeP revealed by charge transport
S. Kasahara, K. Hashimoto, H. Ikeda, T. Terashima, Y. Matsuda, T. Shibauchi
arXiv:1112.5597 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.060503 · 2011-12-23 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By using high-quality single crystals, we quantitatively compare the transport properties between LiFeAs and LiFeP superconductors with compensated electron and hole carriers. The low-temperature resistivity follows the Fermi-liquid $AT^2$ dependence with a factor of $\sim 3$ difference in the coefficient $A$. This highlights weaker electron correlations in LiFeP, which is consistent with its $\sim 70$ times lower upper critical field than that of LiFeAs. Our analysis of the magneto-transport data indicates that in LiFeP the electron carriers with lighter masses exhibit stronger temperature dependence of inelastic scattering rate than the holes, which is the opposite to the LiFeAs case. This stark difference in the band-dependent inelastic scattering may be relevant to the recently reported contrasting superconducting gap structures in these two superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nodal versus nodeless superconductivity in iso-electronic LiFeP and LiFeAs
similarity 0.91R. Nourafkan · 2016 · arXiv:1606.08460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropy of the coherence length from critical currents in the stoichiometric superconductor LiFeAs
similarity 0.89M. Kończykowski et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.5583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gap symmetry and structure of Fe-based superconductors
similarity 0.89P. J. Hirschfeld et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1106.3712
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resistivity and Hall effect of LiFeAs: Evidence for electron-electron scattering
similarity 0.89O. Heyer et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.2876
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Functional Renormalization Group for multi-orbital Fermi Surface Instabilities
similarity 0.88Christian Platt et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.6191
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
de Haas–van Alphen Study of the Fermi Surfaces of Superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs
similarity 0.88C. Putzke et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified