← Back to search

Interface induced high temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3

Qing-Yan Wang, Zhi Li, Wen-Hao Zhang, Zuo-Cheng Zhang, Jin-Song Zhang, Wei Li, Hao Ding, Yun-Bo Ou, Peng Deng, Kai Chang, Jing Wen, Can-Li Song, Ke He, Jin-Feng Jia, Shuai-Hua Ji, Yayu Wang, Lili Wang, Xi Chen, Xucun Ma, Qi-Kun Xue

arXiv:1201.5694 · 2012-01-27

T5experimental

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Searching for superconducting materials with high transition temperature (TC) is one of the most exciting and challenging fields in physics and materials science. Although superconductivity has been discovered for more than 100 years, the copper oxides are so far the only materials with TC above 77 K, the liquid nitrogen boiling point. Here we report an interface engineering method for dramatically raising the TC of superconducting films. We find that one unit-cell (UC) thick films of FeSe grown on SrTiO3 (STO) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) show signatures of superconducting transition above 50 K by transport measurement. A superconducting gap as large as 20 meV of the 1 UC films observed by scanning tunneling microcopy (STM) suggests that the superconductivity could occur above 77 K. The occurrence of superconductivity is further supported by the presence of superconducting vortices under magnetic field. Our work not only demonstrates a powerful way for finding new superconductors and for raising TC, but also provides a well-defined platform for systematic study of the mechanism of unconventional superconductivity by using different superconducting materials and substrates.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

50Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers