Suppression of Superconductivity by Twin Boundaries in FeSe
Can-Li Song, Yi-Lin Wang, Ye-Ping Jiang, Lili Wang, Ke He, Xi Chen, Jennifer E. Hoffman, Xu-Cun Ma, Qi-Kun Xue
arXiv:1203.2629 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.137004 · 2012-03-12 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy are employed to investigate twin boundaries in stoichiometric FeSe films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Twin boundaries can be unambiguously identified by imaging the 90° change in the orientation of local electronic dimers from Fe site impurities on either side. Twin boundaries run at approximately 45° to the Fe-Fe bond directions, and noticeably suppress the superconducting gap, in contrast with the recent experimental and theoretical findings in other iron pnictides. Furthermore, vortices appear to accumulate on twin boundaries, consistent with the degraded superconductivity there. The variation in superconductivity is likely caused by the increased Se height in the vicinity of twin boundaries, providing the first local evidence for the importance of this height to the mechanism of superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe1-xNix)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Suppression of Superconductivity by Twin Boundaries in FeSe
similarity 0.93Can-Li Song et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Plastic Motion in Twinned Superconductors
similarity 0.92J. Groth et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9607182
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic Vortex Phases and Pinning in Superconductors with Twin Boundaries
similarity 0.91C. Reichhardt et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Atomic scale imaging of sign-changing order parameter in superconducting FeSe with Tunneling Andreev Reflection
similarity 0.90Wonhee Ko et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dumbbell Defects in FeSe Films: A Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and First-Principles Investigation
similarity 0.89Huang, Dennis et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.07057
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport evidence for twin-boundary pinning of superconducting vortices in FeSe
similarity 0.89Taichi Terashima et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.00930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified