Comments on the d-wave pairing mechanism for cuprate high $T_c$ superconductors: Higher is different?
Han-Yong Choi
arXiv:1203.4652 · DOI 10.3938/jkps.60.978 · 2012-03-21 · Journal of the Korean Physical Society
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The question of pairing glue for the cuprate superconductors (SC)is revisited and its determination through the angle resolved photo-emission spectroscopy (ARPES) is discussed in detail. There are two schools of thoughts about the pairing glue question: One argues that superconductivity in the cuprates emerges out of doping the spin singlet resonating valence bond (RVB) state. Since singlet pairs are already formed in the RVB state there is no need for additional boson glue to pair the electrons. The other instead suggests that the d-wave pairs are mediated by the collective bosons like the conventional low $T_c$ SC with the alteration that the phonons are replaced by another kind of bosons ranging from the antiferromagnetic (AF) to loop current fluctuations. An approach to resolve this dispute is to determine the frequency and momentum dependences of the diagonal and off-diagonal self-energies directly from experiments like the McMillan-Rowell procedure for the conventional SC. In that a simple d-wave BCS theory describes superconducting properties of the cuprates well, the Eliashberg analysis of well designed high resolution experimental data will yield the crucial frequency and momentum dependences of the self-energies. This line of approach using ARPES are discussed in more detail in this review, and some remaining problems are commented.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 89 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Mechanism of High-Temperature Superconductivity in Correlated-Electron Systems
similarity 0.94Takashi Yanagisawa · 2019 · arXiv:1907.02313
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Validity of the spin-susceptibility "glue" approximation for pairing in the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.93Khatami, E. et al. · 2010 · arXiv:0901.4802
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing Theory of High and Low Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.92Sang Boo Nam · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9707017
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high- cuprates and other systems
similarity 0.91S. Dzhumanov · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02110
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-electron bound states in parity-preserving QED_3 applied to high-T_c cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91H. R. Christiansen et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0107155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kinetic-energy driven superconductivity in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Shiping Feng et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1501.02420
Source status unknown — claims are unverified