Are there nodes in LaFePO, BaFe$_2$(AsP)$_2$, and KFe$_2$As$_2$ ?
Yunkyu Bang
arXiv:1204.0212 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/25/8/084002 · 2012-04-01 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We reexamined the experimental evidences for the possible existence of the superconducting (SC) gap nodes in the three most suspected Fe-pnictide SC compounds: LaFePO, BaFe$_2$(As$_{0.67}$P$_{0.33}$)$_2$, and KFe$_2$As$_2$. We showed that while the $T$-linear temperature dependence of the penetration depth $λ(T)$ of these three compounds indicate extremely clean nodal gap superconductors, the thermal conductivity data $\lim_{T,H \rightarrow 0} κ_S (H,T)/T$ unambiguously showed that LaFePO and BaFe$_2$(As$_{0.67}$P$_{0.33}$)$_2$ are extremely dirty, while KFe$_2$As$_2$ can be clean. This apparently conflicting experimental data casts a serious doubt on the nodal gap possibility on LaFePO and BaFe$_2$(As$_{0.67}$P$_{0.33}$)$_2$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaFePO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2(As0.67P0.33)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy study on iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.91Z. R. Ye et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1307.5754
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodes in the Gap Function of LaFePO, the Gap Function of the Fe(Se,Te) Systems, and the STM Signature of the s Pairing
similarity 0.91Fa Wang et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.3358
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pnictogen height as a possible switch between high-T_c nodeless and low-T_c nodal pairings in the iron based superconductors
similarity 0.91Kazuhiko Kuroki et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0904.2612
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Properties of the -wave state: Fe-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Yunkyu Bang & G. R. Stewart · 2017 · arXiv:1701.00320
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal superconducting gap structure in ferropnictide superconductor BaFe2(As0.7P0.3)2
similarity 0.90Y. Zhang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.0229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Puzzle of High Temperature Superconductivity in Layered Iron Pnictides and Chalcogenides
similarity 0.90David C. Johnston · 2010 · arXiv:1005.4392
Source status unknown — claims are unverified